Kylie Jenner is facing a fourth lawsuit from a former household employee in seven months, after a former housekeeper filed a complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court on 5 November alleging mistreatment and labour violations, according to Parade, which obtained the court documents via Page Six, and Indulge Express. None of the allegations has been proven in court, and Jenner's legal team disputes the claims.
The complaint was filed by Dinora Carolina Cabria Amaya, who says she began working as a housekeeper for Jenner in March 2025, according to Parade. She alleges she was paid $40 an hour in cash while regularly working six days a week, and that she was routinely denied overtime pay and mileage reimbursement for travel between Jenner's properties. She says she was fired on 6 February 2026, shortly after questioning why another housekeeper had received mileage reimbursement when she had not.
Amaya alleges she was locked inside Jenner's large walk-in closet for more than an hour after entering it with a digital passcode, and that a supervisor laughed when she asked for help, according to the reports. She also alleges she was bitten by a pet dog and injured by pepper spray while working at Jenner's Los Angeles home, and that she received no proper medical help or compensation. The complaint brings claims including disability discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, false imprisonment and multiple California labour code violations.
The lawsuit is the fourth brought by a former member of Jenner's household staff since April, according to Parade. Three earlier lawsuits were filed this year: former housekeepers Angelica Hernandez Vasquez and Juana Delgado Soto in April, and a former private chef identified as Jane Doe on 22 June. All four women are represented by the same attorney, Della Shaker, according to the reports.
Jenner's attorney, Michael Rhodes, pushed back against the latest claims, telling Page Six that the cases were brought by the same lawyer and accusing that lawyer of seeking publicity and an unwarranted payout, according to Parade. The allegations remain claims made in a civil complaint, and no court has established whether they are true. The photograph above is from an earlier Nip + Fab interview, not from the lawsuit.